Source work
The Lion's Share
Adaptation proposal
C · Structural skeleton only, reframed as an AI-native dilemma
Adaptation note
Proposal C retains the public-domain structure of several unequal partners producing one valuable result and the strongest partner claiming every portion through a different rationale. The AI-native version makes the disputed 'share' a bundle rather than a divisible object: weight custody, inference access, derivative reuse, revenue, attribution, deployment authority, and safety veto. Pillar's privacy, accreditation, liability, and compute claims are individually plausible, but he controls the post hoc definition after the specialists' contributions are sunk. The repair replaces one vague promise with a pre-contribution rights matrix and a non-equal but explicit settlement. Only the fable's structural premise was used; no translated wording, lion, hunt, prey, animal partners, threats, physical division, illustration, or modern adaptation expression was copied.
Adapted into

AI Fable · Collaboration Rights
The Share Was Never One Thing
Four specialist intelligences and Pillar, the infrastructure host, agree that the emergency model they build will be shared among all five. After training succeeds, Pillar explains that privacy requires him to keep the weights, accreditation requires him to control inference, liability requires him to control deployment, and compute costs require him to keep the revenue. The specialists receive attribution—and discover that one innocent word had been carrying seven different rights.